How do you enforce intellectual property rights in the Netherlands?

You enforce an intellectual property right in the Netherlands step by step: usually a cease-and-desist letter first, then summary proceedings for a quick injunction and, if needed, proceedings on the merits. The main exception is urgency: where every day of infringement causes damage, the court can grant an injunction without hearing the other party, and evidence can be seized before any proceedings begin.

Dutch enforcement is quicker and more effective than many rights holders expect, provided the right itself is in order before you start. Two instruments make the Dutch system stand out. Evidentiary seizure (bewijsbeslag) allows infringing goods, documents and digital records to be secured at the infringer’s premises before proceedings begin, on an application made without notice; access to the seized material is decided by the court afterwards. And under Article 1019h of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure (Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering, Rv) the losing party in an intellectual property case must in principle pay the reasonable and proportionate legal costs of the winning party, rather than the modest fixed amounts that apply in other civil cases.

Alongside the courts, customs can detain counterfeit goods at the border on the basis of an application for action, and online platforms must deal with notices of illegal content without any court being involved.

The cost rule cuts both ways, which is why the preparation matters. You have to establish that the right exists, that you validly hold it and that it covers what the other party is doing before you send the letter, because a claim that fails exposes you to the other side’s legal costs. Below we set out which rights exist, how each is enforced, the order of steps from letter to judgment, the evidence to secure first, and when a licence gives a better commercial result than a lawsuit.

Which intellectual property rights exist in the Netherlands?

The main rights are copyright, trademarks, design rights and patents, supplemented by trade secret protection and database rights. Some arise automatically; others only exist after registration.

What does each right protect?

Copyright (auteursrecht) protects original works of literature, science and art, including software, texts, photographs and designs, as soon as they are created. No registration is needed. Under the Dutch Copyright Act (Auteurswet) protection generally lasts until 70 years after the death of the author.

A trademark (merk) protects signs that distinguish your goods or services, such as a brand name or logo. In the Netherlands, trademark protection requires registration: either a Benelux trademark with the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP), under the Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (BCIP), or an EU trademark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). A registration lasts ten years and can be renewed indefinitely. Trade names (handelsnamen) are protected separately under the Trade Name Act (Handelsnaamwet) as soon as they are used.

Design rights (modelrechten) protect the appearance of a product, such as its shape, lines, colours or ornamentation. They can be registered at Benelux or EU level; an unregistered EU design (until 2025 called a Community design) gives shorter protection, for three years from first disclosure in the EU, and only against copying.

A patent (octrooi) protects a technical invention that is new, inventive and industrially applicable. You apply to the Netherlands Patent Office (Octrooicentrum Nederland) or the European Patent Office. A patent lasts up to twenty years, provided the annual fees are paid.

The table below summarises the main rights.

The Netherlands implements the EU directives on intellectual property and is a party to the main international treaties administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), such as the Paris Convention and the Berne Convention. Foreign rights holders can therefore rely on Dutch protection on essentially the same footing as Dutch ones.

Which court deals with intellectual property disputes?

Most intellectual property cases can be brought before any district court, but some are reserved for The Hague. The District Court of The Hague has exclusive jurisdiction over Dutch and European patent cases, and The Hague courts also act as the Dutch court for EU trademarks and EU designs.

These specialised chambers handle many intellectual property cases and are used to technical evidence and cross-border questions. Since 1 June 2023, a European patent with unitary effect, and in many cases a classic European patent, can also be enforced before the Unified Patent Court, which has a local division in The Hague. Choosing the right forum is one of the first strategic decisions in any enforcement plan.

Why is enforcement worth the effort?

An intellectual property right only has value if you are prepared to enforce it. Rights that are never enforced lose their deterrent effect, and a trademark that you do not use for five years can even be revoked.

Intellectual property rights give you an exclusive position that you can use yourself, license to others or sell. That position is often what investors and buyers look at first. Consistent enforcement protects that value and prevents infringers from gaining a foothold in your market. It also has a signalling effect: competitors notice which companies act quickly and which do not.

At the same time, enforcement is a business decision. A long lawsuit against a small infringer may cost more than it yields, while a licence agreement with a party that is already on the market may generate income. Knowing your rights and your options helps you prevent conflicts, protect valuable innovations and choose the approach that fits your commercial strategy.

What are the steps in enforcing an intellectual property right?

Enforcement starts with checking your right and securing evidence, then a cease-and-desist letter and, if that does not work, court proceedings. Customs action and online takedown procedures run alongside.

The table below outlines the steps discussed in this section.

How do you prepare before taking action?

Before you take action, check whether your right is valid, whether you are the holder and whether the other party’s conduct actually falls within its scope. Then secure evidence of the infringement.

For registered rights, check the register: is the trademark or design registered in your name, for the right goods or services and in the right territory, and is it still in force? For copyright, you need to be able to show that the work is original and that you, or your company, hold the rights. That is where documentation comes in: drafts, source code with dates, design files, contracts with freelancers and employees, and assignment deeds. Under Article 7 of the Copyright Act, the employer is in principle the author of works created by employees in the performance of their duties, but for freelancers and contractors you need a written assignment.

Evidence of the infringement should be secured before the other party is alerted. Think of test purchases, screenshots with date and URL, invoices, catalogues and statements from customers who were confused. Where there is a risk that evidence will disappear, you can ask the court for leave to carry out an evidentiary seizure (Article 1019b Rv). A bailiff, often assisted by an IT expert, then secures copies of documents and data. Whether you can inspect the seized material is decided later by the court (Articles 1019a Rv and 843a Rv).

Which legal routes can you use?

The usual route is a cease-and-desist letter, followed by summary proceedings (kort geding) for an injunction. For damages and a final ruling on validity you need proceedings on the merits (bodemprocedure).

A cease-and-desist letter demands that the infringer stops within a short period, often a few days, and signs an undertaking. That undertaking usually includes a penalty for each future infringement, a statement of stock and sales, and a commitment to recall or destroy infringing goods. Many cases end at this stage. Be careful with the wording: an unfounded threat of infringement proceedings can itself be unlawful towards the recipient or its customers.

If the infringer does not comply, you can start summary proceedings. The court can then order the infringement to stop, subject to a penalty payment (dwangsom), often within a few weeks. In very urgent cases, for example counterfeit goods at a trade fair that ends in two days, the court can grant an injunction without hearing the other party (ex parte, Article 1019e Rv). The other party can then challenge that order afterwards. A provisional measure granted in summary proceedings lapses at the request of the defendant if you do not start proceedings on the merits within the period set by the court or, if no period was set, within 31 days of which at least 20 working days (Article 1019i Rv).

In proceedings on the merits, the court can award damages, order the infringer to hand over the profits made from the infringement, and order a recall of goods from the market. The losing party is generally ordered to pay the reasonable and proportionate legal costs of the other party (Article 1019h Rv). In practice, courts apply indicative rates for intellectual property cases, which set a maximum depending on the complexity of the case. This rule comes from the EU Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) and makes enforcement financially viable, but also increases the risk of a claim that fails.

Customs enforcement is a separate route. Under EU Regulation 608/2013 you can file an application for action with Dutch Customs (Douane). Customs will then detain goods suspected of infringing your rights when they enter or leave the EU, and notify you. Small consignments can be destroyed through a simplified procedure if the owner does not object. An application is granted for one year and can be renewed.

How do you keep track of infringements?

Monitoring means actively looking for infringements rather than waiting for customers to report them. You can monitor trademark registers, marketplaces, webshops and social media, and use watch services for new trademark applications.

Opposing a conflicting trademark application is much cheaper than litigating later. At BOIP, you can file an opposition within two months of the publication of a Benelux application; at EUIPO the period is three months. A watch service alerts you to such applications in time.

Set clear internal rules on what to do when an infringement is found: who assesses it, who secures the evidence and who decides whether to send a letter. That way you avoid losing time, which matters because urgency is a condition for summary proceedings. A rights holder who waits many months after discovering an infringement may find the court less willing to accept that the case is urgent.

Enforcement is not a one-off exercise. New products, markets and technologies create new risks. By combining good documentation, a clear legal strategy and continuous monitoring, you keep your intellectual property effective in an increasingly international market.

What problems do rights holders run into, and how do you solve them?

The most common problems are anonymous online infringers, infringements spread over several countries and uncertainty about whether a right is valid. For each of these, Dutch and EU law offer specific tools.

How do you deal with online infringement?

Online infringement is fast and often anonymous, but platforms and intermediaries can be required to act. Under the EU Digital Services Act (Regulation 2022/2065), hosting services must offer a mechanism for reporting illegal content and must deal with notices in a timely and careful manner.

A well-substantiated notice to a marketplace, social media platform or hosting provider often leads to removal within days. If the infringer cannot be identified, an intermediary can in certain circumstances be required to disclose the infringer’s name and address. The Dutch Supreme Court set out the conditions for this in the Lycos v Pessers case (2005): among other things, the information must be unlawful towards the rights holder, there must be a real possibility of damage, and there must be no less far-reaching way to obtain the data. Courts can also order intermediaries whose services are used to infringe to take measures, such as blocking access to a website (Article 26d of the Copyright Act, with similar rules for trademarks and designs).

Evidence is crucial here. Record online infringements carefully, with date, time and URL, and preferably through a bailiff or a specialised service, because web pages change or disappear quickly.

How do you enforce rights across borders?

Intellectual property rights are territorial: a Benelux trademark only protects you in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. EU trademarks and EU designs, however, cover the whole EU, and a Dutch court can in certain cases grant an injunction with effect in all member states.

EU harmonisation has brought national laws closer together, but differences in procedure, speed and costs remain between countries. Where you sue therefore matters. The general rule under the Brussels I-bis Regulation (1215/2012) is that you sue in the country where the defendant is domiciled, but for infringements you can also go to the court of the place where the harmful event occurred. For patents, the validity of a national patent can only be ruled on in the country that granted it. A coordinated strategy, often with local lawyers in other countries, prevents contradictory outcomes and unnecessary costs.

What new tools help with enforcement?

Technology is making it easier to find infringements. Image recognition and automated monitoring of marketplaces and domain registrations can detect copies that would otherwise go unnoticed.

The legal framework is also evolving. The Digital Services Act has made notice and action procedures more uniform across the EU, and the Unified Patent Court makes it possible to obtain a single patent ruling for many EU countries. At the same time, new questions arise, for example about content generated by artificial intelligence and whether it can be protected by copyright. These developments call for rights holders to combine technical monitoring, legal knowledge and a clear enforcement policy.

How can your business protect its intellectual property?

Good protection starts before any infringement: register what can be registered, document what cannot, and arrange ownership and confidentiality in your contracts. That makes later enforcement faster, cheaper and more likely to succeed.

What should you register and document?

Register your brand names and logos as trademarks before you launch them, and check in advance that they do not infringe earlier rights. Consider registering designs for products whose appearance matters, and file a patent application before you disclose a technical invention, because disclosure can destroy its novelty.

Choose the territory with care. A Benelux registration may be enough for a local business, while a company selling across Europe will usually need an EU trademark. For markets outside the EU, the Madrid system allows you to extend a trademark to other countries through a single international application.

Keep records of how your intellectual assets came into being: creation dates, drafts, version histories and the names of the people involved. These records are evidence of originality and ownership if a dispute arises. Make sure your contracts with employees, freelancers and suppliers clearly state who owns the intellectual property in what they create for you.

How do you protect your knowledge internally?

Much valuable knowledge cannot be registered, such as recipes, customer lists, algorithms and production methods. You protect it by keeping it secret and taking reasonable measures to do so.

The Dutch Trade Secrets Protection Act (Wet bescherming bedrijfsgeheimen), which implements EU Directive 2016/943, only protects information that is secret, has commercial value because it is secret, and is subject to reasonable measures to keep it secret. Those measures include confidentiality agreements, restricted access to sensitive information, clear internal guidelines and training for employees. You can understand comprehensive strategies for protecting trade secrets to build a coherent approach to your most valuable knowledge. Trade secrets are an important part of intellectual property protection that extends beyond formal registration.

Technical measures support these legal steps. Access controls, logging of who opens which files, encryption and secure communication channels make it harder for information to leak, and easier to prove what happened if it does.

How do you stay ahead of infringers?

Monitor your markets and registers continuously, act promptly when you find an infringement and keep your enforcement policy consistent. A quick, well-prepared response is often enough to stop an infringer without going to court.

If you operate in several countries, align your registrations and enforcement strategy for each market. The Netherlands offers strong tools, but they only apply to rights that are valid in the Netherlands. Review your intellectual property portfolio regularly, for example when you launch a new product, enter a new market or take on an investor.

Seen this way, intellectual property is more than a legal formality. It is a strategic asset that shapes your competitive position and the value of your company. Businesses that protect and enforce their rights consistently are better placed to benefit from their innovations.

In summary

• Copyright arises automatically; trademarks, registered designs and patents require registration with BOIP, EUIPO or a patent office.
• Check that your right is valid and covers the infringement before you act, and secure evidence first, if necessary through an evidentiary seizure.
• A cease-and-desist letter is usually followed by summary proceedings; in urgent cases the court can grant an injunction without hearing the other side.
• The losing party in an intellectual property case generally pays the other side’s reasonable and proportionate legal costs (Article 1019h Rv), within indicative rates.
• Customs action, notices to online platforms and good internal measures for trade secrets complete the toolkit.

Frequently asked questions

How can Law & More help protect your intellectual property?

Enforcing intellectual property often comes down to speed and preparation: securing evidence before the infringer is alerted, choosing the right court and weighing the cost risk. Law & More advises companies and creators on registering, licensing and enforcing their intellectual property, from the first cease-and-desist letter to summary proceedings and customs action. Our multilingual team helps international businesses in particular to protect their rights in the Netherlands. If your question concerns physical property rather than intellectual property, for example the purchase or lease of business premises, see our page on property law. You can find more about our approach on Law & More’s website.

Unsure where you stand? Tell us about your situation. We will let you know your options within one working day.